Member-only story

Whitney v. California: The Landmark Law Case that Shaped American Speech Law

Colt Simmons

·3.9k Followers· Follow

Published in Speaking Freely: Whitney V California And American Speech Law (Landmark Law Cases American Society)

4 min read · 2 weeks before

157 View Claps

27 Respond

Save

Listen

On March 13, 1927, Anita Whitney, a labor activist and member of the Communist Labor Party, was arrested in Oakland, California, for violating the state's Criminal Syndicalism Act. The act made it a crime to advocate for the overthrow of the government by force or violence. Whitney was accused of distributing leaflets that called for a general strike to protest the execution of two Italian anarchists, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.

Speaking Freely: Whitney v. California and American Speech Law (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)

by Philippa Strum

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1710 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	203 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

Whitney's trial lasted for two weeks. The prosecution presented evidence that she had distributed the leaflets and that she was a member of the Communist Labor Party. Whitney testified that she did not believe in the overthrow of the government by violence and that she had only distributed the leaflets to inform people about the Sacco and Vanzetti case.

The jury found Whitney guilty, and she was sentenced to five years in prison. Whitney appealed her conviction to the California Supreme Court, which upheld her conviction. Whitney then appealed her case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court reversed Whitney's conviction. The Court held that California's Criminal Syndicalism Act was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. The Court ruled that the Act was too vague and that it could be used to suppress legitimate political speech.

The Whitney case is a landmark in the history of American free speech law. The Court's decision established the "clear and present danger" test for free speech. This test states that the government can only restrict speech that presents a "clear and present danger" to the public. The test has been used in numerous cases to protect free speech rights.

The Whitney case is also important because it helped to shape American society. The decision helped to create a climate of greater tolerance for dissent and political activism. It also helped to establish the principle that the government cannot suppress speech simply because it disagrees with the message.

The Whitney case remains relevant today. In recent years, there have been several cases that have tested the limits of the First Amendment. The Whitney case provides a reminder that the government's power to restrict speech is limited. The clear and present danger test continues to be an important tool for protecting free speech rights.

Speaking Freely: Whitney v. California and American Speech Law (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)

by Philippa Strum

4.5 out of 5