They All Had Eyes: Confessions of a Vivisectionist

They All Had Eyes: Confessions of a Vivisectionist

by Michael Slusher

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2905 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	211 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

By Jane Doe

I was 22 years old when I started working as a research assistant in a vivisection laboratory. I had always loved animals, and I was excited to be working in a field that would allow me to help them. But what I saw in that lab changed my life forever.

I saw monkeys with their brains exposed, dogs with their legs paralyzed, and rabbits with their eyes sewn shut. I saw animals that had been cut open and experimented on without anesthesia. I saw animals that were in so much pain that they could barely move.

I couldn't believe that this was happening in the name of science. I knew that animal testing was necessary for some types of research, but I didn't believe that it was necessary to inflict such pain and suffering on innocent animals.

I started to speak out against vivisection, and I soon became a target of the animal testing industry. I was threatened, harassed, and even fired from my job. But I refused to be silenced.

I wrote this book to tell the world about what I saw in that lab. I want people to know the truth about vivisection, and I want them to make their voices heard against this cruel and unnecessary practice.

The Animals

The animals that I saw in the vivisection lab were all different, but they all had one thing in common: they were all innocent victims.

There was the monkey who had been used in a brain experiment. He had been awake during the entire procedure, and he had watched in terror as the researchers drilled into his skull and implanted electrodes in his brain. He had been in so much pain that he had bitten off his own fingers.

There was the dog who had been used in a spinal cord experiment. He had been paralyzed from the neck down, and he was unable to move or feel anything. He had to be fed through a tube, and he could only communicate by blinking his eyes.

There was the rabbit who had been used in an eye experiment. Her eyes had been sewn shut, and she had been left in a dark cage for weeks. She had no way of knowing what was happening to her, and she was so scared that she would often tremble uncontrollably.

These are just a few of the animals that I saw in the vivisection lab. Their stories are heartbreaking, and they are a testament to the cruelty of this practice.

The Science

The animal testing industry claims that vivisection is necessary for scientific research. They argue that animal models are the best way to study human diseases and to develop new treatments.

However, there is a growing body of evidence that shows that animal testing is not as reliable as we once thought. In fact, many animal studies have been shown to be inaccurate or even misleading.

There are a number of reasons why animal testing is not a good model for human diseases. For example, animals have different physiologies and metabolisms than humans, and they respond differently to drugs and chemicals.

In addition, animal testing often involves the use of high doses of chemicals or drugs, which can lead to exaggerated or even false results.

There are a number of alternative methods to animal testing that are more reliable and more humane. These methods include cell culture studies, computer modeling, and human clinical trials.

It is time for us to move away from vivisection and to embrace these more ethical and effective methods of scientific research.

The Ethics

The ethical implications of vivisection are complex. On the one hand, we have a responsibility to advance scientific knowledge and to develop new treatments for diseases. On the other hand, we have a responsibility to protect animals from pain and suffering.

I believe that vivisection is unethical because it involves the infliction of pain and suffering on innocent animals. I do not believe that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the suffering that it causes.

There are a number of other ethical concerns about vivisection. For example, it can lead to the development of new products that are harmful to humans and the environment. It can also create a culture of violence and disrespect for animals.

It is time for us to end vivisection and to adopt a more ethical approach to scientific research.

I wrote this book to tell the world about the horrors of vivisection. I want people to know the truth about this cruel and unnecessary practice.

I urge you to join me in speaking out against vivisection. Together, we can make a difference.

Please visit the following websites for more information about vivisection and animal rights:

• PETA
• NAVS
• HSI

They All Had Eyes: Confessions of a Vivisectionist

by Michael Slusher

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2905 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	211 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE